Tag Archives: claim

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT FOR VIOXX

Merck's Super Aspirin

9 Years after the recall of the drug Vioxx some of the Canadian victims will be compensated by a class action settlement.

 

VIOXX CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CANADA NOW BEING IMPLEMENTED. FILING CLAIMS OPENED APRIL 20, 2013

THE COURTS OF ALL PROVINCES APPROVED THE VIOXX SETTLEMENT FOR ENFORCEMENT AND NOTICE HAS BEEN PUBLISHED  THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO SUBMIT CLAIMS TO THE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR FROM SATURDAY APRIL 20 TO MONDAY AUGUST 19, 2013.  NOTICE WAS PUBLISHED IN MAJOR NEWSPAPERS ACROSS CANADA ON SATURDAY APRIL 20TH. THIS FOLLOWS THE MAIN SETTLEMENT APPROVALS WHICH TOOK PLACE IN 2012.  DETAILS ARE AS FOLLOWS:

In the summer of 2012 a settlement of Vioxx injury claims in Canada was presented for approval to courts in Ontario, Saskatchewan and then Quebec.  The courts were asked by lawyers for Merck and lawyers for the class action to approve a settlement that was negotiated in 2011 and announced in January 2012. For background information, settlement details and events leading up to settlement approval please read our earlier posts.

The courts were asked to either accept or reject the negotiated agreement and also approve the fees and expenses to be paid from the settlement to the consortium of law firms across Canada who were involved in the class action proceedings.  There was no jurisdiction to change the terms of settlement.  In a decision released September 18, 2012 Madam Justice Leitch of Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice approved the settlement and approved the fees, taxes and disbursements of the class action lawyers.  A similar approval decision was issued by Justice Marcotte of the Quebec Superior Court on October 4, 2012. Justice Currie of the Saskatchewan Court of the Queens Bench also gave approval but without issuing reasons on July 25, 2012.

The settlement as approved provides for the following payments to be made by the drug manufacturer Merck:

1.  $3,500,000 to be paid to Canada’s provincial health insurers to reimburse medical expenses of Vioxx victims.

2.  $1,000,000 to be paid for the cost of notices and claims administration.

3.  $6,000,000 to be paid to the class action lawyers allocated as approximately $4,500,000 for legal fees, $1,000,000 for expenses and $500,000 for GST and provincial taxes applicable to the legal fees.  This does not include any money for the lawyers representing individual claimants who will be paid from the money available to pay actual claims of Vioxx victims.

4.  $22,612,500 to be paid to Vioxx victims who are eligible for payment under the settlement.  That amount will be increased if there are over 1,500 such people to a maximum of $26,381,250. Most claimants will pay their own lawyers a percentage of their recovery for legal fees, taxes and expenses none of which are provided for in the settlement.

To be eligible for payment under the settlement a person must pass both the “usage gate” and the “event gate”.  The usage gate requires a certain amount of Vioxx to be consumed in the time immediately before the event.  The event gate requires a person claiming to have had a heart attack, sudden cardiac death or an ischemic stroke.  Stroke victims will be given $5,000 compensation regardless of the severity of the stroke or its lasting effects.  It is estimated for those with heart attack or sudden cardiac death, that after deductions for various risk factors (other than Vioxx use) and after legal costs the average person will receive $15,000 to $25,000 compensation.  That means some will receive more  and some will receive less.  The maximum in the best case would be about $100,000 before legal fees.  There is also payment to spouses and children (including adult children) of victims which is additional money up to 20% of what is paid to the principal claimant.  In every case certain medical and pharmacy records are required to prove use, show other risk factors and prove that there is a qualifying event.  The cost of obtaining records is an expense that is to be paid from the compensation received. As well most claimants will pay from the compensation legal fees averaging one third of the compensation paid.  They will also pay provincial and federal tax (PST, HST, GST) on the legal fees.  There is no income tax payable on the net compensation that victims and their families will actually receive.

The compensation being paid to Vioxx victims is clearly quite low in relation to the seriousness of having had a heart attack, stroke or sudden cardiac death.  The court considered that these events are common in Canada among persons who have not used Vioxx and that use of Vioxx is not necessarily the cause of the event.  They considered expert medical opinion on Vioxx’s role in causation noting that the connection to stroke is not as clearly proven as the connection to heart attack.  They accepted that persons with other conditions not covered by the settlement were a minority in the class and that it was reasonable and in the best interests of the class as a whole to accept a settlement that did not compensate them. The courts considered the continuing denial by Merck of any liability and the risk of the case not succeeding if the settlement was not approved.  They did consider the negative result in the Australian court and the fact that cases tried in the US had mixed results.  It was noted that even if the case proceeded to trial successfully payment of claims could be delayed by appeals. The court decided that the settlement is in the best interests of the class members.

The approval decisions had to be confirmed for enforcement purposes in the courts of all other Provinces.  This had to be completed before any claims for Vioxx victims can be submitted for processing to the class action administrator.  The Miskin law office is now submitting Vioxx claims for processing and payment.  We have been in contact with the class action administrators who will be receiving claims for compensation and processing them.  On April 20th there will be national advertising of the settlement and the claims processing will then begin. We are sending claim forms to clients to sign and also have signed by family members who are eligible for compensation.  This was expected to happen some time in January 2013 but due to delays in Provincial enforcement approval it took until March to get all the Provincial court orders and we now know that April 20 is the first day to begin to submit claims for processing. There is a period of four months open for submission of claims. At the end of that period assessment notices will be sent out by the claims administrator for every claim filed and payment of Canadian Vioxx claims will finally begin. If you believe you have a claim and have a lawyer make sure they have everything they need to file the claim.  If you do not yet have a lawyer you really should get one immediately to ensure you have everything you need in time to make a claim. Our office is still accepting new clients who qualify under the settlement but it is necessary to fully document claims which makes it difficult if you have not started to document a claim. It is essential to move quickly to have sufficient information in time to file a successful claim.

Yaz and Yasmin Claims Class Action Certification

Lawsuits Against Bayer

Bayer’s Birth Control Products

 

 

Many individual law suits in the USA  and Canadian Class Action lawsuits are in progress over the side effects of the two similar birth control pills Yaz and Yasmin. Serious side effects include deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and very commonly loss of the gallbladder.   Those cases are being fought by the manufacturer Bayer in different US districts where they are co-ordinated in Multi District Litigation (MDLs). The courts in Illinois and Pennsylvania ordered  mediation to take place before cases were to go to trial in early 2012. In the mediation process Bayer agreed in early March 2012 to a settlement in 70  lawsuits.  There are now as many as 3500 settlements of the most serious cases involving deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism in the USA in the range of $200,000 each.  Until recently there was no settlement for gallbladder cases but they are now beginning to settle for much less.  Gallbladder cases are settling in the range of a few thousand dollars.  Also in Canada settlements are generally much lower than they are in the US and so expectations on all cases should be lower.  The earlier settlements were only for women who took Yaz or Yasmin and suffered deep vein thrombosis (blood clots) or a pulmonary embolism.  We are hopeful that some progress will be made towards resolving claims in Canada after there is certification of the Canadian Yaz and Yasmin Class Action lawsuit.  We are hoping they will settle gallbladder cases as well as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism cases as part of the likely future class action settlement. The greatest number of claims relate to gallbladder where nominal settlements should be expected in Canada.   The pills continue to be sold and to be very profitable for Bayer.  A recommendation to recall the drug was narrowly defeated by an advisory committee to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).  Bayer has changed its advertisements and product warnings since then.  THE CLASS ACTION HAS NOW BEEN LIMITED TO CLAIMS FOR INCIDENTS UP TO NOVEMBER 30, 2011 SO IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM THAT CAME UP AFTER THAT DATE IT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE CLASS ACTION AND IT WOULD BE GOOD TO CONTACT A LAWYER IMMEDIATELY TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS.  

Yaz or Yasmin can cause dehydration which causes an increase in the potassium levels (hyperkalemia) and a decrease in the sodium levels (hyponatremia) in the body.  As potassium acts as a key control in cardiac rhythm, this imbalance can cause hyperkalemia arrhythmias, which, in turn can cause blood clots and thrombotic events such as stroke or deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or heart attack. Dehydration is also a risk factor for kidney stones and gallbladder disease. While other birth control pills can also cause deep vein thrombosis and other thrombotic events, the cause of those effects are from the estrogen side of the equation. The thrombotic effects of Yaz and Yasmin are from the progesterin side. While it has long been accepted that high estrogen levels can cause these adverse events, the birth control pills Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella have been marketed as having low estrogen levels, thereby having a lower risk for thrombotic events. There have been several studies that have called this into question.
The Miskin Law firm is making claims related to these oral contraceptive drugs and working with the class action court proceedings that have been started in Canada. These proceedings take a long time to advance and they stop individual law suits from proceeding for now. An application for certification of the class action was heard in the Ontario court in late January 2013 before Justice D.S. Crane.  A formal decision has not yet been made but on April 15, 2013 the judge released reasons for decision where he rejected arguments against certifying the class action.  He expressed concern over the proposed timetable for proceedings and there will be further discussion before a formal certification order is actually given.  It is expected that a court order of certification of the class action will issue soon.  Until then we are working to document our clients’ claims and we are being retained by new clients.  We represent people to get them compensation both individually and through the class action process. Once there is certification by the court of the class action people will have a choice of claiming through it or trying to get more with special circumstances in an individual claim and we will explain that option to each of our clients. Contact us if you believe you have been harmed by Yaz or Yasmin. Email Murray Miskin directly: miskinlaw@yahoo.com

Canada Asbestos Mesothelioma Injury Claims for Clients



Asbestos Mesothelioma Injury Claim Lawyer in Canada

ASBESTOS EXPOSURE IS KNOWN TO BE DEADLY

Deadly Asbestos Fibers

 

Attention Canadian Asbestos Victims and family members: Compensation for those who suffer and the families of those who have died in recent years from serious asbestos related diseases from asbestos exposure is available to our clients in Canada.  Some Canadians are eligible for provincial Workers Compensation benefits and except in Alberta have a choice on whether to accept it or make a claim with a lawyer potentially for greater compensation.  You have probably seen plenty of confusing Asbestos Cancer and Mesothelioma ads from lawyers in the US promising big compensation if you call their toll free numbers.  When you do call they often do not understand your situation or you may not even get through because many US toll free numbers can not be reached from Canada.  If you are in Canada, you do not need to hire a lawyer in the USA to make a claim. You can have a Canadian lawyer represent you to make a claim for compensation for asbestos related diseases and get the same compensation and probably more. A Canadian lawyer can investigate your situation and advise you on your choices including Workers Compensation. The US lawyers have very little information about Canadian work sites known for asbestos and generally do not try as hard to get compensation for Canadian clients.  A Canadian lawyer who works on asbestos case can do the investigation needed to get compensation from the most sources.  There are very few lawyers in Canada who do handle these claims and for our firm it is now the largest part of our work. We check carefully on each claim to find as many asbestos exposure sources as we can to maximize the available compensation. We cross reference claims from our own data base of Canadian asbestos hot spots.

Miskin Law Offices in Ontario represents clients all across Canada in making claims to American asbestos trusts. This is not a lawsuit and you do not go to court to get compensation. They are essentially applications for compensation to Bankruptcy funds set up when almost all makers of asbestos products were put out of business by the many claims made against them based on serious harm caused by their products. Applications for our clients are made to many different asbestos trusts and our clients get compensation from multiple sources. We are familiar with Canadian law and workplaces. We understand how the Canadian system works and have many advantages in representing Canadian clients. We are familiar from case experience with Canadian asbestos use history and where known asbestos hazards exist.  Exposure to asbestos gives rise to a claim if the person exposed becomes ill from it even many years later. The asbestos trusts are all based in the United States and we usually work with American lawyers to advance our cases with a contingency fee split between our firm and the US law firm. The American lawyers we work with put the claims forward to the asbestos trusts.  Our clients do not pay more to have Canadian representation and applicable  GST/HST is included in our percentage of the contingency fee. If the American lawyers can not help you we do not just give up.  We investigate further. If at the end of our investigation of your claim we conclude that we can not help you there is no charge to you for our services.

THE DANGERS OF ASBESTOS:  We are working to build awareness of the dangers of asbestos and the specific disease of Mesothelioma through our website Asbestos Facts Canada .  Asbestos is a mineral that has been used as an insulating and fireproofing material for many years in a great number of products and in many buildings.  It is still present in many older buildings such as hospitals and schools and is safe if encapsulated and poses a serious hazard if it is disturbed.  It has been mined in various parts of the world including Quebec where there is a Town called Asbestos.  In the September 4, 2012 election the Quebec Liberal Government of Jean Charest which promised a loan to reopen the asbestos mine was defeated by the Parti Quebecois which opposed asbestos. Federal Government support for continued asbestos mining and exporting asbestos to the world has been a very controversial issue. Since the Quebec election the loan to the mine has been cancelled so it will not reopen and Federal Government support for the asbestos industry is fading. The use of asbestos is banned in Canada and most developed countries. Let your Federal Member of Parliament know how you feel about Canada exporting this deadly substance. Here is a link to an Operation Maple video about Canada’s export of asbestos including an interview with Murray Miskin:Asbestos Mesothelioma

Mesothelioma Asbestos Cancer Compensation

Murray Miskin in Asbestos Mesothelioma Video

It has been known for many years that asbestos is dangerous to the health of people exposed to it especially when fibers are inhaled and get into the lungs. it can stay in the lungs for many years without a person knowing it is there. There are serious long term consequences of exposure to asbestos.  Some of the most serious ones have only recently started to commonly appear.  Mesothelioma was once considered a rare condition but sadly it has now become very common. The diseases include asbestosis, certain forms of lung cancer and the condition of mesothelioma.  Mesothelioma is a cancer of the lining (known as the mesothelium) of the lungs or another organ. Mesothelioma can develop 30-50 years after even just a little exposure to asbestos.  Mesothelioma was thought to be a very rare condition but it is appearing more commonly because it takes a long time to develop and it was not always diagnosed properly in the past. Mesothelioma can only be caused by asbestos and maximum compensation is available for this horrific and generally fatal disease.

The very serious diseases affect people who have worked with asbestos, had loose fibers in their workplace (sometimes from or after asbestos removal) and people who have been exposed by their family members who may have come home from a hard day of work with asbestos on their bodies or their clothes.  We have worked on tragic cases where children of parents exposed to asbestos have developed Mesothelioma and can be compensated.

Asbestos Compensation for Canadians is Available

If a loved one has developed one of these conditions in Canada or the USA and is seriously ill or has died due to asbestos exposure it can be proven with medical records and compensation will follow.  Doctors should be able to confirm causation by asbestos when the diagnosis is made. A biopsy is most effective. Compensation is available for Canadians from a number of U.S. trusts set up for that purpose.  This compensation is only open to people who live in Canada and the United States. To maximize compensation we need to investigate each case and know the source or sources of exposure to asbestos to determine which manufacturers were involved and where claims may be placed. If a person is suffering from Mesothelioma we move quickly to get necessary information and documentation including affidavits to be sworn to maximize compensation. If a person has died from asbestos illness a number of years ago the available claims are limited by the delay in proceeding. Some of the asbestos trusts have longer time limits so it is worth checking if there is a positive diagnosis even if the death was long ago.

We do not handle claims related to removal of asbestos from homes or other properties nor do we sue employers for asbestos exposure or illness. We also do not take on cases involving fear of possible asbestos illness. We only handle cases involving people who have serious asbestos illness. Having “asbestos on the lungs” may entitle a person to very small compensation but more importantly it means they are at risk for serious disease and should be monitored by their doctors regularly.

Contact Miskin Law Offices

Contact the Miskin Law Offices in Ontario for information on making a claim for asbestos related diseases.  Email miskinlaw@yahoo.com or call 416-492-0989 from the Toronto area or toll free 877-428-8000 from elsewhere in Canada. You can have us as your lawyers here in Canada and get compensation from the trusts set up to pay claims on behalf of the former asbestos manufacturers in the United States. Again we will investigate your possible claim with no cost on your part. If we can get you compensation our fees and expenses are fully paid from the compensation you receive.

We are working closely in partnership with experienced reputable lawyers from the Locks Law Firm in Philadelphia to ensure that Canadians get fair compensation equal to what is available to Americans payable in US dollars (which is no longer to our advantage). Usually, we work hard to determine the source of asbestos exposure to maximize the available compensation funds. If we can prove a particular company’s products were used we can get compensation from the applicable trust (again it is not a lawsuit and you do not go to court).  Many people have no idea where they were exposed or do know but know little about the specific asbestos products.  There has to be significant illness diagnosed, not just fear of future illness to make a successful claim. Cases are handled with contingency fee agreements which include a one third fee shared by the lawyers involved on your behalf.  That means you pay nothing until and unless money is received for your claims.  Settlements are in US dollars, which vary in value when converted to Canadian dollars. We include the tax in our share of the one third contingency fee so you will not pay any additional PST, GST or HST on a settlement.

Often we can get clients compensation from more than one trust fund. We make sure to try all relevant asbestos trusts to maximize compensation.  Eligibility for multiple trust compensation is dependent on the source of the asbestos exposure. The more details you have on the source of asbestos and specific asbestos products and dates of exposure the more sources of compensation there are.  We are seeing some large cheques come in for our clients and faster processing of claims. If you are not eligible for Worker’s Compensation we can get you compensation so long as we can prove asbestos to be the cause of an illness or if there is a Mesothelioma diagnosis.  With confirmed Mesothelioma, that is not a problem.  The right to bring a claim may be taken away by receipt of or application for Workers Compensation Benefits so do let us know details of any WCB, Work Safe or WSIB claims made when you first contact us. DO NOT APPLY FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION FOR MESOTHELIOMA UNTIL YOU HAVE HAD LEGAL ADVICE.  The Boards have brought U.S. claims for a number of Canadians through American law firms and where that is done we can not bring a claim. Sometimes we need consent from the Workers Compensation Board or from the employer who in some situations pays the benefits, before we can proceed. Compensation Boards keep all of the money that they recover from U.S. claims as reimbursement for what they paid to the injured worker and only pay the worker or their family the excess amount if there is any. Workers Compensation pays a contingency fee to the lawyers they use and also charges its own administrative fee from money it recovers. There is rarely if ever money that they will pay to the worker or the worker’s family from the asbestos trusts.  We are consulting with the Compensation Boards in different provinces to ensure that our clients actually receive maximum compensation from all sources. In some Provinces Workers’ Compensation Boards have allowed us to proceed directly for clients with claims to the asbestos funds where the Boards have rights to make those claims. Persons entitled to benefits from Alberta Workers Compensation do not have any right to make a separate claim for compensation. In Ontario we are claiming on behalf of families of victims and on behalf of School Boards with respect to illness from asbestos exposure in schools.

Murray Miskin has been a lawyer in Ontario practicing personal injury law for over 30 years and has worked on national and international injury claims.  Our experience gives us an edge in representing Canadians on asbestos claims. Murray Miskin has been familiar with asbestos and asbestos products since childhood as his father Nat Miskin was a Toronto plumber who worked with asbestos.  Murray’s first work with Canadian asbestos injury claims was in 1979 at the Phelan, O’Brien law firm in Toronto as soon as he finished law school. We are settling many asbestos claims  now and getting compensation for our clients.  These are not lawsuits in court but are applications to compensation funds done with paper work and no personal appearances by clients. We will treat you and your family with compassion and respect and get you results without added stress or work on your part. If you have documentation of the medical condition and information on the source of asbestos exposure (especially type of asbestos product) that helps us get results more quickly. There is no advance fee or financial retainer required and there is no risk to the client. The lawyers are only paid from the funds collected with a regulated contingency fee from the recovery split between the lawyers working on the claim.

You may call our office at a local number or toll free nationally at 1-877-428-8000 and speak with Anna at Extension 118, or Murray at Extension 111 about your situation.  For a speedy response seven days a week email details to Murray Miskin directly: miskinlaw@yahoo.com


Merck Vioxx Class Action Settlement Court Approval

Merck’s Super Aspirin was Vioxx

THIS IS AN APRIL 20, 2013 UPDATE OF INFORMATION ABOUT COURT APPROVAL OF THE SETTLEMENT OF THE CANADIAN VIOXX CLASS ACTION NEGOTIATED WITH MERCK BY THE CANADIAN CLASS ACTION LAW FIRMS AND ANNOUNCED OVER A YEAR AGO IN JANUARY 2012. THE SETTLEMENT WAS CONDITIONAL ON COURT APPROVAL AFTER CONSIDERING THE FAIRNESS OF THE TERMS OF SETTLEMENT. FAIRNESS HEARINGS HAVE BEEN HELD IN ONTARIO FOR ALL OF CANADA, EXCEPT SASKATCHEWAN (WHICH HELD A HEARING FOR SASKATCHEWAN JULY 25) AND QUEBEC WHOSE HEARING WAS ON SEPTEMBER 7TH. FINAL COURT APPROVAL OF THE SETTLEMENT WAS GIVEN BY EACH COURT. THERE WAS NOT ENOUGH OF A CASE AGAINST THE SETTLEMENT BROUGHT TO THE COURT TO FORM A BASIS FOR TURNING DOWN THE SETTLEMENT.  THE THREE JUDGES CONSULTED EACH OTHER TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY IN THE THEIR DECISIONS AND REASONS.

The remainder of this post has only been partially updated to note the completion of settlement approval.  For the latest information go to our new web page after reading this.

OUR LAW FIRM, WHICH REPRESENTS OVER 300 VIOXX CLAIMANTS, IS BASED IN ONTARIO AND MURRAY MISKIN ATTENDED THE ONTARIO HEARING ONLY. THE FAIRNESS HEARING IN ONTARIO WAS HELD AT THE LONDON COURTHOUSE 80 DUNDAS STREET ON TUESDAY JULY 17TH AT 10 AM BEFORE MADAM JUSTICE LEITCH OF  THE ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT. HER HONOUR INDICATED SHE WILL PREPARE A DECISION TO BE RELEASED AFTER CONSULTATION WITH THE SASKATCHEWAN AND QUEBEC JUDGES HEARING THE SAME MOTION.  AT THE HEARING SUBMISSIONS WERE MADE BY MICHAEL PEERLESS OF THE SISKINDS  LAW FIRM ON BEHALF OF THE CLASS ACTION PLAINTIFFS AND BY KATHERINE BEAGAN FLOOD ON BEHALF OF MERCK WITH TWO PEOPLE SPEAKING AGAINST THE SETTLEMENT INCLUDING GARY ROBERTS THE HUSBAND OF ONE OF OUR CLIENTS WHO IS NOT ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION UNDER THE SETTLEMENT.  THE OTHER PERSON SPEAKING WAS MRS. DUFOUR WHO STOPPED USING VIOXX A FEW MONTHS BEFORE HER HEART ATTACK AND WHO WOULD NOT QUALIFY UNDER THE SETTLEMENT. MURRAY MISKIN WHO CAME TO OBSERVE THE PROCEEDINGS WAS ASKED BY THE COURT TO SPEAK AND DID SO ON BEHALF OF HIS CLIENTS SOME OF WHOM SUPPORT AND SOME OF WHOM OPPOSE THE SETTLEMENT.

THE ONTARIO HEARING APPLIED TO ALL CLAIMS EXCEPT THOSE IN QUEBEC AND SASKATCHEWAN. ORDERS HAVE BEEN MADE IN ALL PROVINCES SETTING OUT THE APPROVAL PROCESS REQUIREMENTS. THE FOLLOWING IS A LINK TO THE ONTARIO COURT ORDER SETTING OUT INFORMATION ABOUT THE SETTLEMENT AND THE APPROVAL PROCESS: ONTARIO COURT

The settlement was announced in January 2012 with much attention by the media but there has been almost none since then.  Notices were posted in newspapers nationally about the court dates on June 9, 2012. Everyone who is affected had a right to be heard on this and the settlement is only to be approved by the court if it is believed to be in the best interests of Vioxx victims.  There has been no media coverage of the settlement approval process and this website has been the only source of information on what has happened and what has  happened until now.  There are now official notices and more information at vioxxclassaction.ca

 The following information about Vioxx and the settlement was published in this website’s post before the court approval dates:

Merck’s once popular anti-inflammatory drug Vioxx turned out to be a deadly drug for many people. It was voluntarily withdrawn and then recalled in 2004 with numerous lawsuits that followed, including, in Canada, a Class Action claim which took precedence over possible individual claims under Canadian law. Merck fought claims world wide settling in the USA only after a few years.  Our firm brought some claims in the New Jersey court working with US lawyers on the cases.  When the US case settled in November 2007 it was a term of settlement that all foreign claimants cases had to be dropped by the US lawyers.  At that point the judge handling the case had already ruled that British claimants should proceed in the court of their own country and we were expecting a similar decision for Canadians.  We then had no choice but to wait for the Canadian class action which had been delayed by arguments between lawyers over which law firm would manage the case and then by Merck’s procedural delays and appeals.  When the Canadian case was finally certified to proceed with no further right to appeal some of our clients with stronger cases chose to opt out of the class action so they could make individual claims hoping for better settlements.

In Australia last year Merck did well after a major test case trial which found liability only in heart attack situations and specifically concluded after much expert evidence that there is no proof that Vioxx causes strokes or other cardiovascular problems. The Judge ordered compensation in a heart attack case but that was overturned on appeal by Merck.  The negative finding in stroke cases was not even appealed as the evidence was clearly not enough for proof.  It was after the Australian case victory that Merck was ready to negotiate with the Canadian Class Action lawyers.  The negotiations conducted on behalf of all persons in Canada claiming, resulted in a settlement agreement announced January 19, 2012.  There is a national Vioxx settlement in Canada.  The amount of the settlement is proportionately much less than the US settlement on a per capita basis.  It provides compensation up to $100,000 in heart attack and sudden cardiac death cases and pays an amount capped at $5,000 in ischemic stroke cases.  Stroke compensation does not include payment for Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIA). Nothing is paid in the settlement for hemorrhagic strokes or other conditions. This settlement was negotiated with Merck by the Class Action lawyers not the law firms (like ours) representing individual clients. When a settlement agreement was reached by the negotiators it asked for persons who had opted out of the Class Action to agree to opt back in and accept the settlement.  This happened as all the clients now represented by Canadian lawyers who had opted out agreed to accept the settlement. Our opted out clients were not prepared to take the high risk of proceeding with their own individual cases in court. Those who had not opted out of the Class Action were not given a choice.  Our firm acts for a large number of individual clients, and we are determining how each of our clients will benefit (or not) from the settlement). It is a complex settlement factoring dates of use in relation to the cardiac event and with numerous reductions based on risk factors. We have written letters to most of our clients who do not qualify for compensation under the settlement to advise them of their rights.  We have written to others where we need additional information to determine if they will be compensated and for some we are still trying to determine if there is eligibility. We are preparing and sending out actual claim forms to our clients and family members for signature.  We are now submitting claims where the documentation is complete with forms all signed.  We have many clients who clearly benefit from the settlement and we are documenting their claims for compensation.  For people who are not represented by lawyers yet, we are still on request, reviewing situations and accepting retainers in cases that qualify for compensation.

THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPHS HAVE NOT BEEN UPDATED SINCE SETTLEMENT APPROVAL WAS GIVEN:

We have heard from a number of angry clients and others who will receive little or no compensation.  We also have clients who are happy with the settlement and that they will be compensated finally even where the compensation is not believed to be adequate.  If you are not happy with the settlement do speak out and the court will consider what you have to say.  Our firm is not in a position to take a position for or against the settlement as we have many clients who have conflicting views and we can not represent some to the detriment of others. We can not say that we are happy with this settlement. It is not as good a settlement as the one for users of Celebrex or Bextra who suffered similar harm.  We encourage our unhappy clients to get independent advice and legal representation if they wish to oppose the settlement.  To be fair to the class action lawyers it is their view that this is a good settlement which was the best that could be done given the nature of the case and the impact of the Australian court decision. Had Merck been willing to negotiate earlier there is no doubt that the settlement would be better.  In the US the pressure of numerous cases being reached for trial put pressure on Merck to settle much sooner and for a lot more money for each claim.

Further to the Australian trial decision and appeal,  the Australian High Court in May 2012 denied an attempt to appeal the dismissal of the claims and so that is the end for the Australian Vioxx case.  Australia’s laws are similar to Canada’s and the Australian decision has a major legal impact on us.  The decision gives much ammunition to the class action lawyers who argue that the Canadian settlement is a “very good one”. All of this will be considered by the Ontario and Quebec courts when the court approval application is heard. We do expect approval to be given to the settlement and after that claims will be processed.  It is likely that the first settlement money will be received by claimants in early 2013.

Several months ago the NBC TV show Dateline NBC taped an episode including an interview with Pam Cottingham, one of our Vioxx clients, who suffered a serious stroke at age 43 following Vioxx use.  That show was aired on Sunday March 4, 2012 and shows how a drug like Vioxx can still be approved. You can see the entire show below in six parts with the portion dealing with our client and the Vioxx settlement in Canada in Part One.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

We continue to act for everyone in our existing group of clients to get compensation but we are only taking on new cases which qualify under the Canadian settlement.

 

A Yasmin Experience


Anonymous Female

Our client writes:

The following is the story of one of our firm’s clients who suffered adverse effects after using Bayer’s birth control pill Yasmin. Miskin Law Offices represents a number of clients who are involved in a class action against Bayer for Yasmin and a similar drug Yaz. The Class Action is now waiting for a court certification order. We continue to accept new clients:

I was 20 years old; about to begin my second year of college. I was put on Yasmin at a young age; not as a contraceptive, but to balance my hormones. I began taking it so that I would get my period and develop normally. I should not have been put on the drug so young, and it has resulted in not only a Pulmonary Embolism; but Deep Vein Thrombosis as well. I had numerous clots throughout my entire right leg, pelvis, and lungs. It was a miracle that I survived it. I have to take blood thinners for the rest of my life, and have been told that I may never be able to carry a child. 

As a result of the incident, I was in the hospital for over a week. I was prescribed numerous pain medications for several months. I could not walk and had to return to school less than 3 weeks later or else I would have to put my career on hold for over a year in order to finish the program. (There were no openings until September of 2012). So I sucked it up and returned to school immediately on crutches; and my grades dropped drastically. I sought counseling and accessed Assisted Services within school.

Forever more, I will not be able to consume ANY other hormonal treatment for the imbalances in my body. I could have been on more natural supplements if I wasn’t so negatively affected by Yasmin. Their advertisements are inappropriate, and that they attract very young women to their product.  All because of them, I have to suffer with these symptoms for the rest of my life and may not be able to carry a child. Any treatments to prepare my body for such an event would fatally harm the baby or myself. I have been severely depressed due to no periods and embarrassing hair growth. As a survivor, I wish to ensure that others are compensated for their loss. I want women to feel safe, receive justice, and know that future generations will not be affected by Yasmin. Many women have suffered like I have; writhing in pain like never before. Many have experienced the loss of a mother, sister, daughter, friend, or lover to the affects of Yasmin. I am one of the lucky few to have overcome the affect, with permanent complications as a result.

Canadian Asbestos – Mining, Exposure and Export

Asbestos Snow in "The Wizard of Oz" movie

;

;

;

Since the 1870s the mineral asbestos was mined in Quebec and Canadian asbestos mining used to be considered one of our country’s greatest natural resources and sources of wealth. Nobody had heard of Asbestosis or Mesothelioma resulting from asbestos exposure. Asbestos was seen as one of the greatest substances known to man. Asbestos is virtually indestructible, it is a most effective fireproofer and insulator with many practical uses. Asbestos uses have included artificial snow for Christmas decoration and for movies like 1939′s The Wizard of Oz with Judy Garland, and Holiday Inn, which in 1942 introduced the song White Christmas. Regular asbestos use was common across Canada in covering pipes, electrical wiring, insulation, floor tiles, children’s toys, kitchen equipment, blankets, curtains, bricks, cement, gaskets, fireman’s suits, auto brake linings, lawn furniture and even filters for cigarettes. Asbestos use and fire safety were almost synonymous words. Regular daily asbestos exposure was a fact for most Canadians.

There has been Asbestos use by people in cookware and in clothing for over 4,000 years. The word asbestos comes from a Greek word meaning “unquenchable” or “inextinguishable”. Charlemagne, the first Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, was known to have an asbestos tablecloth in about the year 800. When Marco Polo visited Siberia in his travels during the 13th Century, he was presented with asbestos clothing which he was first told was made from special wool from a magical lizard (salamander). Its qualities were considered magical. Marco Polo eventually did learn that asbestos actually came from the ground. Like spices and pasta the mineral asbestos was brought back by Marco Polo and introduced to Europe where asbestos exposure and use became common. Asbestos use became more common for industry in the 1800s. As Canada developed, asbestos was discovered and asbestos mining developed into a major Quebec industry.

Long before anyone knew of the potential for extracting large quantities of oil from the bitumen of the Alberta tar sands, the magical mineral asbestos was viewed as one of Canada’s greatest assets. “These enormous asbestos deposits in the province of Quebec are immensely valuable to Canada in war and peace, and they form a very important part of our great heritage of mineral wealth,” said CBC Radio’s Lorne Greene in 1942, on-site at the Jeffrey Mine in Asbestos, Quebec. But far worse than today’s oil from sand, which has a huge environmental price attached to it, the more easily mined asbestos comes with a deadly impact on miners, people who work with it and people simply exposed to asbestos in everyday life. Asbestos mining has advanced with protection for the miners. The asbestos exposure danger is greatest from breathing in asbestos fibers. The fibers remain in the body indestructible and for many people slowly causing serious diseases like asbestosis and mesothelioma.

In ancient days there was some suspicion of ill effects from asbestos use as it was noted that the slaves who wove asbestos into clothing became ill and had breathing difficulty. They were the symptoms of asbestosis. The connection to asbestos exposure was noted but not a concern since the weavers were slaves and easily replaced. It was not until 1906 that the first human was diagnosed as having died as a result of asbestos exposure. Researchers began to investigate respiratory health problems in asbestos mining towns and it became clear asbestos exposure was the culprit. Conditions such as asbestosis where long term asbestos exposure causes severe respiratory disease became known in the early 1900s with the first official asbestosis death noted in medical journals in 1924. Mine owners and other business users of asbestos did all they could to suppress knowledge of the danger of asbestos. The horrible condition of Mesothelioma which is a deadly and painful cancer of the lining of the lungs was discovered in the 1920s but not linked to asbestos until the 1940s. Mesothelioma can only be caused by asbestos exposure. By the 1970s awareness and fear of asbestos related diseases led to asbestos use being regulated and phased out. There were strikes in the mines due to safety concerns. Lawsuits began which eventually put most mines out of operation and most asbestos product manufacturers into bankruptcy. Asbestos mining is now a very small industry in Canada but asbestos mining continues to get strong support from the Quebec Government in its attempts to support the asbestos mining industry.

Canada continued asbestos mining and export even though asbestos use is banned in Canada and most developed countries. Canadian asbestos is now killing people all over the world with support for the asbestos mining industry from both the Federal and Quebec Governments despite growing opposition to it by Canadians. The Government of Canada has helped prevent a world ban on asbestos and it’s support for the Canadian asbestos industry is a major political issue today. Please view Operation Maple’s video regarding Canada exporting asbestos featuring an interview with Murray Miskin: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEgwgfVmv7g

More and more Canadians are finding they have Mesothelioma or other serious cancers and other conditions (asbestosis, pleural plaques) caused by exposure to asbestos and asbestos use which may have been many years ago. The Miskin law firm represents Canadian asbestos victims and their families in getting compensation for Asbestosis, Mesothelioma and other diseases. We work to promote awareness of the dangers of asbestos exposure. There is compensation for some people for asbestosis and mesothelioma through Workers Compensation, and we bring claims to asbestos trusts set up to pay claims for asbestos victims from the assets of the asbestos product companies. The greatest compensation is for victims of mesothelioma. Miskin law offices are the leading mesothelioma lawyers in Canada. Call our office or Email miskinlaw@yahoo.com if you or a family member believe you have a claim.

We now have a new informational website where we provide more asbestos facts related to Canada along with links to many asbestos and mesothelioma related resources and organizations. It is www.asbestosfacts.ca

We encourage you to learn more and join the battle to protect Canadians from asbestos and to protect the world from Canadian asbestos exports.

Asbestos, Quebec, Canada